In power distribution and transmission, two prevailing systems are in control—cables underground and cables overhead. Both are the very important task of carrying electrical power from power generation plants to homes, industries, and commercial establishments, but they vary greatly in structure, installation cost, price, maintenance, and efficiency.
This article is all about a complete comparison of overhead and 33 kV Underground Cables, their nature, pros, and cons. Identification of the differences is critical to utility companies, city planners, and constructors who have to select the best system in an application.
1. Construction and Installation
Overhead Cables:
Overhead cables hang suspended in the air and are supported by towers or poles. The cables are typically made of aluminum conductors strengthened with steel for durability. Insulation is often kept to a minimum, depending on the air around them as a type of natural insulation. These are typically easier to access and cover a lot of distance.
The laying of overhead cables is simple and relatively rapid. Utility poles or towers are installed along the route desired, and cable suspended between them is accomplished by using lifting equipment.
Cables installed underground:
Subterranean cables are buried. They are appropriately insulated and sometimes armoured to shield them from physical damage, moisture, and chemical corrosion. Underground cables are buried in ditches or conduits and then covered in layers of sand, bricks, and earth to achieve safety and longevity.
Underground cables are more complicated to install. They include excavation, correct positioning of the cable, backfill, and restoration of the environment, which makes them labor-intensive and time-consuming.
2. Cost Factors
Overhead Cables
Another benefit of overhead cables is that they are extremely cost-effective in the initial cost. Used materials (poles and conductors) are inexpensive, and installation is faster and less expensive. Maintenance is typically less expensive as well since faults are easier to find and reach.
Underground Cables:
The underground system is much more costly to install. The cost of the insulated cable, trenching, and labour quickly mounts up. Maintenance is also expensive because finding and fixing faults involves digging and frequently specialist tools.
Yet underground systems have a longer life and are cheaper to maintain as they are exposed to fewer of the environment's hazards.
3. Aesthetic and Environmental Impact
Overhead Cables:
Overhead cables have a detrimental effect on the scenic value of an environment, particularly for residential areas or areas with scenery. Sight of the pole and the cable overcrowds the skyline and lowers the value of a property or landscape.
They also suffer from exposure to wind, storms, and lightning that cause frequent faults and accidents such as collapsed cables.
Underground Cables
Underground cables are much cleaner and neater to look at. Because they are below ground, they do not impact visual appeal and are best suited for downtown and suburban home regions.
They also provide better protection from the environment, and as such, they have fewer chances for storm-related outages, tree limbs hitting the lines, or wildlife tampering.
4. Maintenance and Fault Detection
Overhead Cables
Overhead cables' maintenance is relatively simpler. As cables are visible, wire faults, short circuits, or sagging lines are easily identifiable. They can be repaired at reasonable speed by simply climbing on the pole or using aerial lifts.
Underground Cables
Fault tracing in underground buried cables is tougher. As they are buried, and with special equipment and exploratory excavation in some instances, one cannot easily determine the site of failure. The repair work is cumbersome and costly as a result.
Apart from that, buried cables are not susceptible to faults in the first place due to their outer covering layers and weather protection insulation.
5. Safety
Overhead Cables
Overhead wires present a greater public safety hazard, particularly during natural disasters. Downed lines can result in electrocution or fires. They can also block traffic and get in the way of storm cleanups and earthquake preparedness.
In rural or wooded regions, overhead wires can likewise be a source of wildfires since tree branches are knocked into power cables by strong winds.
Underground Cables:
Underground systems are safer in nature. Opportunities for accidental contact are slim, and they will be less likely to ignite fires or harm. Over that, being underground, they cannot be easily accessed and manipulated or impaired by inclement weather, making a safer and more dependable power supply system.
6. Reliability and Performance
Overhead Cables
While overhead cables are less expensive and require minimal maintenance, they are susceptible to disruptions. Storms, lightning, and even birds or tree branches can cut them. In certain regions, disruptions are inevitable and prolonged due to the unfeasibility of cable restoration following natural catastrophes.
Underground Cables
Subterranean cables are more stable. They are not tainted by wind, rain, snow, and animals and thus very reliable. There is less outage, and subterranean cables, if installed well, may run for decades without any serious problems.
But during a breakdown, repair duration is longer than overheads since it is difficult to reach the cables.
7. Space and Urban Implications
Overhead Cables:
In densely populated city centers, overhead cables are obtrusive since there is no space to support poles and it leads to visual noise. It can be difficult to install or extend overhead cables in old cities with dense existing infrastructure.
Underground Cables:
Subterranean systems are best suited for city locations. They occupy no space on the surface and can be operated more conveniently in ducts and utility corridors. This is a better utilization of the ground and also allows other structures such as roads and buildings without upsetting them.
8. Lifespan
Overhead Cables
The life expectancy of overhead cables averages 25–40 years depending on the environment and the maintenance schedule. They tend to be replaced from time to time due to exposure to sun light, wind, and mechanical stresses.
Underground Cables
Laid underground cables have a lifespan of between 40 and 70 years. They degrade much slower because of exposure to minimal environmental stresses and degradation, provided quality materials and the installation procedure are adopted.
Conclusion
Both overhead and underground cables are integral components in power supply with both merits and demerits. Overhead cables excel in economy and convenient maintenance but fall short in aesthetics, security, and reliability. Underground cables offer clean, secure, and reliable power at the expense of more expensive installation and repair.
The choice between either of them is based on an array of factors—geography, expense, town planning, climate, and long-term ambitions. Most contemporary power grids will use a mixed strategy: transmission via overhead wires and distribution via underground cables in critical or high-value regions.
With advancements in infrastructure and smart city plans going forward, the trend could shift towards greater use of underground cable systems backed by newer technologies to contain costs and enhance fault detection and repair effectiveness.
Also Read: How do Mining Cable Manufacturers Design Custom Cables for Specific Mine Conditions?